Monthly Archives: February 2014

Ah, the Keys!

Standard

Over at OWWW, there’s a new batch interested in The Six Keys (the beginner/intermediate individual workshop I tutor). I’ve never taught a round of that without first going over the whole business, to catch snags and update the links. So a couple of those took up the weekend.

I really need some new short stories for the crit practice each week. I need ones with obvious problems in plot, characterization, dialogue, world-building, openings and endings, or pacing and tension. Either science fiction or fantasy will do. I’ve been using this same set for years, and I’m sick of seeing them.

They have to be professionally published, sometime in the past, preferably not too old. Right now I have Isaac Asimov, Larry Niven, Tanith Lee, Zenna Hendersen,  A. E. Silas, Megan Lindholm, Mildred Downey Broxon, Jack Vance (a favorite author of mine: I have no mercy). I think it’s a morale advantage to them to realize even big names can drop the ball.

I think I may have a ghastly bad piece of steampunk, which is a Western with a pasted on clockwork prosthetic, but it’s like “too bad”: a one-trick pony that never does its trick. It’s not easy finding stuff in that Goldilocks zone, not so bad that it can be critted in ten lines, but bad enough my students can see what’s wrong if they don’t let the names dazzle them.

Folks — can you help me out here?

Whew!

Standard

Got the genres finished. Single-handed, based on a lifetime of promiscuous reading.

If you have any questions or see any holes, please feel free to use the comments sections. I’d appreciate the help polishing it up.

Back next time with actual revising work. But OMG the templates pages loom on the horizon.

Listening to the Peter Gunn OST album. Sometimes only Cool Jazz will do. I’ve been collecting lists on my 8tracks account. Dark outside the bus windows, rain spattering on them — must have smooth trap set and desperate horns.

Revision 04.1.04 — Fantasy & Science Fiction, pt. 2

Standard

The easiest way to explain the spectrum of fantasy to science fiction is to just paint it on the wall.

•    Fantasy.
•    Science Fantasy, the usual place you find Space Opera and Planet Stories.
•    Soft Science Fiction. Includes “non-magical fantasy,” and “hard fantasy.”
•    Science Fiction.
•    Hard Science Fiction.

Fantasy includes all kinds of things, and they really don’t spectrum — they’re just different settings or things to use as elements or mechanisms. It’s the science fiction folks who get fussy about how much science their stories have going.

So —
Read the rest of this entry

Revision 04.1.04 — Fantasy & Science Fiction, pt. 1

Standard

Fantasy, we all ought to know, is stuff we make up so it isn’t like reality, on purpose. “Fantasy” as a genre, does not require quests, dragons, swords, or strange places. In fact, science fiction is a subset of fantasy: fantasy is the oldest form of fiction (we can track it back into mythic tales, where the tellers may have thought that stuff was real, but it appears at least in Ancient Egypt, in “The Tale of the Shipwrecked Sailor”), and science fiction is a special form of it that came into existence about 1818, as a fantasy that tried to explain its non-reality in terms of postulated science rather than magic.

That’s the literary approach. In marketing terms, they both come under the 1970s term “speculative fiction,” invented to soothe the ruffled feathers of über-geeks who didn’t want their science fiction called fantasy, like it was icky Tolkien or something. Science fiction at least nods to science and makes up some good-sounding terminology to let them do whatever they need to do: the big word right now is “nanobots,” right? Anything you want to do, someone came up with some free-ranging nanobots that will provide the effect. The other big thing is wormholes, and they don’t even hold them with quantum foam. (Sometimes it’s hard to believe I was raised on Galaxy and Analog, and then again maybe that explains my attitude.) This coming up with good-sounding terms and theories is called hand-waving, smoke and mirrors, or phlebotinum, all meaning “stuff that doesn’t make hard science sense but works in the story.” Read the rest of this entry

Revision 04.1.10 — This, That, and the Other Genres

Standard

Animal Stories

These have non-human protagonists, animals that, nowadays, we don’t want to over-sentimentalize or make into humans in animal suits. Predators hunt, prey has to defend itself in any place not a zoo, and Bambi won’t have any clue as to who his father is.

Of course, children’s fantasies and humor are always another matter. In that case we may be getting into animal fables or anthropomorphized animals, where the squids and foxes are indeed humans in beast suits, acting and thinking like people in similar situations. These range from Aesop’s fables to The Lion King. “Furry fandom” is its own market, where the animals become upright and bipedal with hands and other human anatomy, though usually with fairly animal-like heads. Read the rest of this entry

Revision 04.1.06 — Thrillers & Suspense

Standard

A lot of best-sellers come out of these genres, because if you do it right, the whole idea is to keep people breathlessly turning the pages until long past bedtime. The difference between whether something is marketed as a thriller or as a suspense novel may depend on which is selling better this year: they’re very close, the way fantasy and science fiction shade over at science fantasy.

Read the rest of this entry